Climate-Nightmare-Real

Is the Climate Nightmare Real, or Just Another Halloween Scare?

Freedom Financial News | Posted Oct 31, 2024

Dear Reader,

They say there’s nothing new under the sun. But this Halloween, Clif High is aiming straight for the skies with a jaw-dropping lawsuit against the “climate engineers” who’ve allegedly been painting our atmosphere with a toxic cocktail of “chemtrails.” High’s legal battle could shake the foundations of geoengineering in America. If you’re in for a thriller worthy of your best tin-foil hat, read on.

  • $100 Billion Lawsuit Threatens Climate Engineering: Clif High’s $100 billion suit could upend geoengineering practices in the U.S., accusing agencies and companies of climate tampering and environmental neglect.
  • Fighting Pollution & Unwanted Cloud Cover: The lawsuit is rooted in pollution laws and nuisance claims, challenging the legality of “chemtrail” emissions altering our skies and air quality.
  • Get Ready to Suit Up: High stakes for those fed up with the so-called “climate engineering”—join Clif High’s rallying call to seek justice for “chemtrail” damages and clean skies.

High’s lawsuit seeks a whopping $100 billion, a figure that seems almost as large as the blue sky he’s trying to protect. The claim? Damages against government agencies and private companies allegedly behind what’s called “stratospheric atmospheric injection.”

To put it in simpler terms, High is calling out those who may be spraying particles into the sky—particles linked to a practice that supposedly aims to dim the sun, alter weather patterns, or even introduce strange substances into the air we breathe. And he’s taking this fight straight to the federal court in Washington State.

The Legal Grounds for High’s Lawsuit

Taking on this case “pro se,” High is standing solo against corporations and government heavyweights. It’s David versus Goliath, with High filing a federal complaint that accuses these “climate engineers” of violating several major environmental laws. First, he’s turning to the Clean Air Act, which sets strict regulations on air pollution and mandates permits for any activity that could affect public health. High’s suit argues that these injections violate air pollution standards and infringe on the public’s basic right to clean, uncontaminated air.

But it’s not just about pollution. High is alleging what he calls a public nuisance—a claim that these emissions interfere with the rights of all who breathe the air or look up at the altered sky. Public nuisance laws are broad and are designed to protect citizens from large-scale interference with public health or comfort. And High isn’t stopping there. If particles from these “chemtrails” are indeed raining down on people’s property, he could have grounds for a trespass claim, too.

High’s accusations don’t lack detail. In fact, he’s building a solid case by also referencing selenite and other exotic materials purportedly used in atmospheric modification. Selenite, with its moisture-attracting qualities, has popped up in various studies and patents related to weather modification and moisture control(Climate Engineering ). The implications are wild: imagine particles intentionally placed in the atmosphere that could affect cloud formation, rainfall, or even the air quality itself. High’s lawsuit questions if we’re experiencing climate engineering as a high-stakes experiment in our very skies.

What It Means if High Wins—or Even Just Gets His Day in Court

While a win could force companies to halt climate engineering activities, even just getting this case in front of a judge would be groundbreaking. If a federal court allows High’s case to proceed, it could open the door for citizens across the country to hold these entities accountable. Imagine a legal precedent where corporations can’t alter the air we breathe without repercussions. High’s lawsuit, if successful, would set the tone for future cases, giving everyday people a way to fight back against what they see as rogue experiments in our own backyard.

But it’s more than that. High’s suit hints at something far more chilling—a level of governmental oversight and participation in these practices. He’s not just calling out private companies but also targeting the agencies that may have sanctioned or even supported these climate-modifying activities. If High’s accusations hold up, we could be looking at a modern-day horror story where the powers meant to protect us are actually contributing to the very thing we fear.

How You Can Join the Cause for Clean Skies

For those who’ve watched the skies turn strange shades of silver and gray, for those who’ve seen unusual cloud patterns and wondered if something else was at play, High’s lawsuit offers a rallying call. His battle against “climate engineers” could open a new chapter in environmental law, allowing citizens to confront those altering our air quality and weather patterns. And here’s the kicker: anyone concerned enough to try following in his footsteps can do so with the outline he’s provided. High’s message is clear—he’s not just suing for himself; he’s leading a charge that others can join.

If you’re ready to step into this spooky arena, be prepared for a legal fight packed with everything from federal environmental regulations to the complexities of public nuisance law. And for those looking to stand against chemtrails, High’s lawsuit could be the signal to start their own cases against similar practices. He’s laid out the legal framework, making it easier than ever for others to follow suit.

To check out High’s original post and stay updated on the twists and turns of his legal journey, visit his post on X. This Halloween, as you dress up as your favorite spooky character, you might just want to consider adding a tin-foil hat—it’s shaping up to be the most appropriate costume of the season.

Freedom Financial News

Editor’s Note: Legendary financial analyst Porter Stansberry has an urgent new election warning for all investors.

Porter is known for making bold predictions and exposing some of Wall Street’s biggest secrets. Barron’s magazine has described him as “prescient.”

Legendary names in finance and economics – such as Ron Paul, Jim Rogers, the late T. Boone Pickens, Steve Eisman, Steve Forbes, Jim Grant, and countless others – have all turned to Porter for his analysis.

That’s because Porter has an incredible ability to see through misinformation and hype, spot untold risks, and direct his readers to the most timely and best investments in the market.

Porter’s latest warning (which he’s calling one of the biggest and most consequential of his career) involves both – a historic crisis and an opportunity around the 2024 election.

To get the details of Porter’s new election warning, go here now before it’s too late.