Dear Reader,
One of the most disturbing aspects of the recent assassination attempt on President Trump is the financial activity that preceded it.
- Shorts against Truth Social stock spiked just before the assassination attempt on President Trump, suggesting foreknowledge of the plot.
- This parallels the suspicious stock activities before 9/11, where insiders profited off the tragedy.
- The implications of these actions reveal a troubling intersection of financial greed and potential complicity in acts of violence.
Foreknowledge and Financial Bets: An Eerie Parallel
Shorts against Truth Social stock more than doubled from July 1 to July 12, indicating that some entities were betting on a significant drop in the stock’s value. This spike in shorts occurred just one day before the assassination attempt.
Credit: https://x.com/DiedSuddenly_
To put it bluntly, these actions suggest that some individuals or organizations had foreknowledge of the plot against President Trump’s life and were trying to profit from the anticipated chaos. As if we needed more evidence of the depths to which some will sink for financial gain, this scenario brings to mind a chilling historical parallel.
Historical Parallels: The 9/11 Precedent
We saw a similar pattern on September 11, 2001. On the eve of the attacks, significant bets were placed against the stocks of major airline companies, American Airlines and United Airlines. An investigation revealed that a single entity and an insider newsletter tipped off investors to bet against these airlines, knowing they would suffer catastrophic losses after the hijackings.
Even major news organizations reported on the unusual options activity surrounding the 9/11 attacks:
- CNN Headline: “Unusual Market Activity Could Be a Signal”
- CBS News Headline: “Suspicious Trading Before the 9/11 Attacks”
- The Wall Street Journal Headline: “Investigators Probe Unusual Trading”
James Rickards, a renowned financial expert, noted, “The level of options activity in the days leading up to 9/11 was unprecedented. It indicated that some investors had advanced knowledge of the attacks.”
As Jim always says, “facts don’t care about your feelings,” and the fact is, this kind of financial manipulation hints at something deeply sinister. These actions were not merely opportunistic; they were premeditated attempts to profit from impending disasters, pointing to a level of foreknowledge that demands scrutiny and accountability.
The Implications: Greed and Complicity
The implications here are vast and troubling. If entities were indeed aware of the assassination attempt on President Trump and used this information to make financial gains, we are looking at a case of greed so profound that it intersects with complicity in a violent act.
This isn’t just about money; it’s about a systemic issue where financial markets are manipulated by those who have inside knowledge of tragic events. It’s a stark reminder that we need transparency and rigorous investigations to uncover the truth and hold those responsible accountable.
The financial activity surrounding the assassination attempt on President Trump and the 9/11 attacks reveals a disturbing pattern of foreknowledge and profit from tragedy. This is more than just a conspiracy theory; it’s a call to action for greater transparency and accountability in our financial markets.
Freedom Financial News Team
