- A huge admission long overdue…
- The real science deniers…
- Want the #1 stock to buy before the huge SpaceX IPO? Get the free ticker here.
Dear reader,
Today, on this second Friday of May, we turn our focus from war, oil and the gasoline price.
We turn our focus from the hurly-burly of the stock market… from government extravagance… from the national debt.
We instead turn our focus towards a monumental concession.
It is a concession that has drawn little notice in mainstream media outlets.
Like a rare diamond commingled with worthless rocks… it is concealed deeply within fine print. And very likely, intentionally.
It is an awestriking and gobsmacking concession nonetheless.
This concession centers upon what is likely the most concentrated propaganda offensive of the 21st century — climate.
Failed Prophecies of Doom
By way of review…
The Chicken Littles and calamity-howlers of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have for decades hollering about pending climate catastrophe.
I refer to the cooking of Earth’s ice caps they shrieked about, the submergence of coastal metropolises such as New York City, astonishing hurricanes, global drought, famine and all species of cataclysm.
Here I cite but one example of failed cataclysmic prophecy:
In 1989 NASA’s James Hanson divined that the Hudson River would claim New York’s West Side Highway by 2019.
I motored an auto down the West Side Highway within recent weeks — some seven years after I should have been piloting a boat down an expanded Hudson River.
The roadway was dry as tinder.
The Hudson River lapped harmlessly and nonmenacingly several feet to its starboard.
At the going rate the West Side Highway will remain high, will remain dry, for the next 544 years… at minimum.
Meantime, Mr. Albert Gore prophesied in 2006 that, “”within the decade, there will be no more snows of Kilimanjaro.”
Here is a recent picture of Kilimanjaro:

Source: Trip Advisor
They Finally Admit It
Yet now the Chicken Littles and calamity-howlers of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change presently concede — essentially — that they have been yanking false alarms.
They presently deem the catastrophist scenarios they peddled for years and years… implausible.
And be assured: “Implausible” is a tuxedoed term for fictional. Or, if you prefer, impossible.
Climate scientist, Dr. Roger Pielke Jr.:
- The international committee responsible for the official scenarios that feed into climate modeling that are the basis for… the assessments of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has just published the next generation of climate scenarios.
- Big news:… (They have) now admitted that the scenarios that have dominated climate research, assessment, and policy during the past two cycles of the IPCC assessment process are implausible: They describe impossible futures…
- This is an absolutely huge development in climate science which will have lasting impacts across research and policy.
A “Thought Experiment”
“Impossible futures.” Yet for decades we were scolded that these impossible futures would be actual futures absent drastic action to scotch the demon molecule — carbon dioxide.
Dr. Pielke notes that the fresh update considers climatic cataclysm “a thought experiment, not a projection.”
Yet was climactic cataclysm ever anything other than a thought experiment, not a projection?
A thought experiment conducted to terrify governments into extreme restrictions on industry… to collar mass funding for climate scientists themselves… and to enrich “green energy” concerns?
I hazard these were the central imperatives of the thought experiment.
And now comes the concession that the entire edifice was erected upon beach sand — dry beach sand yet to be enveloped by the waves.
Mr. Chris Morrison of The Daily Sceptic:
- It cannot be over-emphasised how important this finding of implausibility is. It means that almost every fearmongering mainstream media climate headline and story that has been written over the last 15 years is junk.
Junk indeed.
Who Were the True Science Deniers?
How often were heretics from Mr. Gore’s pseudo-religion denounced as “science deniers” or some such?
How often were they accused of being in the pay of “Big Oil?”
I do not know the precise answer. Yet I do know it was very, very common.
Of course it was the climate catastrophists who denied science.
They placed their zealous faith in climate models shot through with false inputs that nearly always exaggerated actual warming.
The garbage went in the front… and the garbage came out the back.
These models were not merely incorrect. They were often orders of magnitudes incorrect.
A Perfect Record of Failure
The senseless chimpanzee, banging randomly and furiously at his Corona typewriter, will duplicate War and Peace in its entirety… all 1,215 pages… precise to the final comma… precise to the final dash… precise to the final apostrophe… aeons and aeons before these Wrong-Way Charlies give an accurate prediction.
Geophysicist Mr. Allan MacRae:
- By the end of 2020, the climate doomsters were proved wrong in their scary climate predictions 48 times. At 50-50 odds for each prediction, that is like flipping a coin 48 times and losing every time! The probability of that being mere random stupidity is one in 281 trillion!…
- The global warming alarmists have a perfect NEGATIVE predictive track record — they have been 100% wrong about every scary climate prediction — so nobody should continue to believe them.
And, thank the angels and saints, very few will continue to believe them.
Let us consign the true science deniers to the outermost darkness, where… in my telling at least… they richly belong.
It is high time.
Regards,
Brian Maher
for Freedom Financial News




